How Livable Oakville just became a lot less Livable

A bad outcome from a flawed process

How Livable Oakville just became a lot less Livable
Find Oakville's Cheapest Gas

About the Author

Karen Brock

Karen Brock

Karen Brock has a passion for protecting the environment and human health. Karen has been president of Oakvillegreen since 2011, a board member since 2010 and a volunteer with Ground Breakers, Oakvillegreen’s tree planting program, prior to that.

Latest posts (See all)

Development has won another battle in gobbling up Oakville green spaces. The Town of Oakville and Halton Region have just backed down in their efforts to enforce a natural space zoning in their own official plan. As we sift through the documents just released, it appears that the Town has given approval for 1000+ residential units, on an area where the original application only contemplated 700 odd units.

Oakvillegreen had been hopeful, and even confident, that science and broad municipal opposition, would prove that the Saw Whet Golf Course lands were the wrong area to develop and clearly required protection.

We are angry and disheartened that environmentally sensitive greenspace and nature will once again lose out to developmental pressures. The “zone it, don’t own it” strategy used by the Town has proved ineffective in preserving greenspace.

The question we are now asking is: Why did the Town of Oakville settle when the Saw Whet area was NOT identified in the Official Plan as an area targeted for growth?

Municipalities with a solid Official Plan should be able to choose, where they want development. The proposal to develop Saw Whet was widely opposed by Oakville citizens and the Town Council. Once again, the municipality’s wishes appear to have fallen to defeat in the face of an Ontario Municipal Board review. It is unclear and frustrating to us why the Town settled. It is hard to imagine a worse outcome from the OMB than the recent settlement reached by all parties.

The Town will talk about ‘environmental wins’ and percentages of space protected, but we believe they are putting a brave face on a big loss.

The Saw Whet Lands are an integral part of the Fourteen Mile Creek Valley and catchment area, which has been identified as an Environmentally Sensitive Area. Scientific alarm bells went off everywhere with the first mention of developing the golf course lands. There was even a scientific recommendation years ago to ADD to this environmentally sensitive area in order to protect this rare habitat and its numerous endangered species.

This development approval becomes a case of death by a thousand cuts. No amount of mitigation efforts will ever preserve this sensitive valley now.
We are all daily witnesses to the results of climate change and environmental degradation. There is a scientific consensus that greenspaces and their ecosystems provide immeasurable benefits yet we continue in a downward spiral gobbling up valuable greenspace for private sector profit.

Which greenspace is going next?

Amid the noise of the Bronte Green application, we can see that through this settlement, the Bronte West Lands, an area on the west side of Bronte Road and part of the Bronte Creek watershed, have also been approved for development.

The net result: a large area zoned Parkway Belt and Natural Area is being developed.

Shoe-horning over a 1000 + residential units and commercial buildings on a sensitive greenspace, and calling yourself Bronte Green is a gross act of “greenwashing”. The only green they can be referring to is the colour of the money lining their pockets.

More importantly, what does this decision and flawed process mean for the fate of Deerfield Golf Course and Glen Abbey Golf Course?

This is a case of another developer victory. A broken process reaches a flawed result. The winner: The developer, the bully with deep pockets. The loser: Nature and the wildlife and humans who rely on it.

What can you do?

Let the politicians know how you feel.

The Town of Oakville is holding an open house for participants to ask questions with respect to the revised plan on Thursday, November 17, 2016 from 6-8pm at Town Hall, 1225 Trafalgar Road.

Tell the Ontario Provincial government that you want Municipalities to be able to have the final say in their land use planning. Contact Yasir Naqvi, the Attorney General of Ontario, to tell him the OMB needs to be eliminated or reformed.



, , , , , , , , , , ,

Readers Comments (7)

  1. Dave says:

    I viewed the Council video and am now well aware of who voted for more development… trust me, I will make my family, friends and neighbours aware of these councillors that voted for more development… and do my very best to see that they are defeated in the next election. I’ll be starting with Councillor Tom Adams.

    • Jim says:

      Why not identify ALL the councillors that voted for the development, then other voters not in your ward can make their voices (votes) heard.

      • Dave says:

        That’s exactly what I plan to do… I believe I wrote, I’ll be starting with Tom Adams… get yourself more informed and take a stand as well… you’re either for more construction or, you’re against it.

        • April Ward says:

          If you could share that list or where to get it….
          others will be more than happy to write them as well….

  2. Rob says:

    Great more housing… just what we DON’T need… North of Dundas near 6th line has become a horrible landscape of end-to-end housing…. a few small play grounds, a small pond or two. The traffic is horrendous as it is and will only get worse judging on the flattened trees and empty fields that are now dirt and lamp posts ready for 100’s of new homes. Stop building houses and build more areas for people to hike, cycle, skateboard, fish, swim, etc. Houses = traffic, and we certainly don’t need more of that! The development here is out of control, council is only thinking revenue…..I am considering moving out of here soon. Oakville = Overhoused

  3. […] How Livable Oakville just became a lot less Livable […]

  4. John P. McLaughlin says:

    I warned Oakville residents that Council could not be trusted to protect green spaces — it needs more tax revenues to hide the hundreds of millions of dollars of debt. After Council “fauxed” protestations in 2015, they made a 2016 “back-room” deal to increase the number of units to 1.181 built upon Saw-Whet golf course. They betrayed your trust.

    Look at which Councillors (and Mayors) voted to support the flip-flop and you can vote at the ballot box too in this 2018 Municipal Election. Show the Mayor your disapproval by not voting for him.

You must be logged in to post a comment.